hello literary creatures this is the final post of the excerpt i had posted earlier....
Shakespeare,
it is claimed by many modern critics, was a feminist. Shapiro for example
goes so far as to claim that Shakespeare was 'the noblest feminist of them
all'. Although I am inclined to agree with McLuskie that as Shakespeare
'wrote for a male entertainment', it is historically incorrect to regard him
as a feminist. I believe that Shakespeare because of his extraordinary genius
for portraying human behaviour, necessarily depicted the condition of women
within a patriarchal system and created women characters which in their
richness, transcend the limitations of his time.
In
this essay I will explore chiefly Shakespeare's treatment of the three
heroine's Ophelia, Desdemona and Cleopatra, of the tragedies Hamlet,
Othello and Antony and Cleopatra, beginning with an
exploration of Shakespeare's representation of the effects of a patriarchal
system upon the characters.
|
Ophelia, it would seem, wholly at the mercy of the male figures
within her life, is certainly a victim figure. Although it has been claimed by
critics that Hamlet is unique amongst Shakespeare's tragic heroes for not being
to blame for the tragedy of the play, if we are to consider the death of the
heroine as part of this tragedy then surely we must question Hamlet's
innocence. In his treatment of Ophelia, Hamlet oscillates between protests of
undying love and cruelty such as his cold and accusing speech in the 'nunnery
scene'. In short, Hamlet throughout the play uses Ophelia as a tool in his revenge
plan.
To examine this culpability more deeply however, it could be
suggested that it is Queen Gertrude's behaviour that has instigated Hamlet's
unforgivable treatment of Ophelia: She transgresses the patriarchal bounds of
femininity by marrying so soon after her husband's death and not remaining in
passive grief and obedient devotion to his memory. This provides Hamlet with a
model of women's inconstancy. His bitterness leads him to believe that all
women are untrustworthy - 'Frailty thy name is woman' and as R. S. White puts
it, Hamlet projects upon Ophelia the 'guilt and pollution' he believes exist in
Gertrude's behaviour. However we view his culpability, Ophelia suffers as a
result of Hamlet's patriarchal values of womanhood.
With regard to her father and brother, the two direct ruling male
forces in her life, Ophelia is also very much a victim. Unquestioningly obeying
their remonstrances against pursuing a relationship with Hamlet, she rejects
his advances - which of course she believes to be genuine - and thus when he
pretends to be mad she believes it to be her fault. Her speech reflects her
deep and genuine sorrow:
And I of ladies, most deject and wretched
That sucked honey of his music vows ...
O woe is me.
That sucked honey of his music vows ...
O woe is me.
Ophelia's feeling of guilt is reinforced by Polonius's insistence
to King Claudius:
But Yet I do believe
The origin and commencement of this grief
Sprung from neglected love
The origin and commencement of this grief
Sprung from neglected love
Polonius's conviction, in which one can't help believing, stems
from a mercenary desire to marry his daughter off to such an eligible husband
as the prince of Denmark, rather than a genuine belief in his daughter's role
in causing Hamlet's madness.
Thus when Hamlet murders her father, Ophelia enters a double realm
of guilt, believing herself to be to blame for both Hamlet's madness and her
father's death. As a result she becomes mad. Although at one level this decline
into madness sets Ophelia up indisputably as a victim figure, on a deeper level
perhaps her madness itself can be seen as Ophelia's active rejection of patriarchal
restraint. Charney Maurice suggests that since within Renaissance drama
madwomen were 'more strongly defined than madmen', and women's madness was
'interpreted as something specifically feminine', through depictions of madness
dramatists were able to give women a chance to express their selfhood - 'make a
forceful assertion of their being' - in a way which patriarchal conventions
would otherwise have prevented.
In the later tragedy, Othello, it can also be argued
that the tragedy occurs from adherence to patriarchal rules and stereotypes.
Gayle Greene summarises this position in her claim that the tragedy of Othello
stems from 'men's misunderstandings of women and women's inability to protect
themselves from society's conception of them'. Certainly Desdemona's very much
feminised qualities of passivity, softness and obedience are no match for
Othello's masculine qualities of dominance, aggression and authority. After
Othello in his jealousy has struck Desdemona and spoken harshly to her, she
tells Iago, 'I am a child to chiding'. Protected by a system which makes women
the weaker, dependent sex, Desdemona is unequipped to deal with such
aggression; she is helpless against Othello. As Dreher puts it 'following
conventional patterns of behaviour for wives and daughters, these women lose
their autonomy and intimacy and do not achieve adulthood'. Desdemona thus
retreats into childlike behaviour to escape from reality.
With regard to men's misunderstandings of women, Greene points out
that Iago's manipulation of Othello - the cause of the tragedy - occurs only
because of 'the views of women the moor already possessed'. This is certainly a
convincing argument, for Othello all-too-easily accepts a stereotypical view of
his wife based on the authority of a male voice. He loses sight of the real
Desdemona, allowing every action of hers, once his suspicion is stimulated, to
reaffirm this stereotypical conception of her.
At the close of the play Othello attempts to vindicate himself
from intentional murder by claiming that he did nothing 'in malice', but is
simply a man 'that loved not wisely but too well'. This speech illustrates the
precarious position of love in a society submerged in stereotypes. Othello's
excessive, 'unwise' love for Desdemona is tied up with his perception of her as
representing perfect womanhood, and his underlying fear of her - endorsed by
society - as whore. Like Hamlet, who tells Ophelia 'get thee to a nunnery' in
order to protect her chastity and remove his fear of woman's infidelity, Othello
too wishes to erase Desdemona's sexuality and potential for infidelity. His
decision to kill her, he claims, is to prevent her from a further transgression
- 'Yet she must die, else she'll betray more men'. As Iago's insinuations
build, the gulf between this perception of Desdemona as angel and the fear of
her as whore grows, leaving Othello in a void of confusion and doubt:
. . . By the world,
I think my wife be honest, and think she is not.
I think thou [Iago] art just, and then think thou art not.
I think my wife be honest, and think she is not.
I think thou [Iago] art just, and then think thou art not.
In Othello's refusal to hear Desdemona's own protestations of
innocence, Othello is very much a tragedy in which the female is subordinated
by the male.
In Antony and Cleopatra, Shakespeare again explores
the idea of the victim within a patriarchal society. However, in this play the
gender roles are inverted and it is Antony who is the true victim. Stifled by
the rules of the patriarchal society of Rome which expects him to retain a
masculine side only, and not to adopt the feminine qualities of passion, emotion,
and love, Antony's control over his life diminishes. Within such patriarchal
confines the role of lover must be subordinate to the male's political role.
After finding an extraordinary and powerful love with Cleopatra - which
Shakespeare establishes to perfection - Antony is unable to accept the
'business first' principle of the patriarchal laws. Like the typical female
heroine of a tragedy, Antony's plight escalates when he is rushed into an
arranged marriage of convenience. He cannot remain away from Cleopatra and
faithful to Octavia who symbolises Caesar and the power of Patriarchal Rome. He
says 'though I make this marriage for my peace,/ I'th' East my pleasure lies'.
Inevitably he returns to Egypt and Cleopatra, and causes a rift which can never
again be cemented between himself and Caesar, which ultimately results in war.
The first words of the play, spoken by Philo, illustrate the
growing condemnation of Antony's untraditional behaviour, which is not confined
within the 'measure' of patriarchy: 'Nay but this dotage of our General's /
O'erflows the measure'. The patriarchal males view Antony's devotion as
shameful - 'His captain's heart ... become the bellows and the fan / To cool a
gipsy's lust'. Surprisingly, in modern-day readings of the play, this attitude
still exists: in W. Baker's view of the play - in my opinion a view grossly
over simplified - 'throughout the play [Antony] is suffering from a disease,
his passion for Cleopatra, which obsesses his mind and which causes him to
desert his public responsibilities'. It is true that the play is ultimately
concerned with the conflict between love and politics; Egypt and Rome; but to
simply reject the former as wrong, is to miss the nuances of the play and
succumb to a view of the polarities of masculine and feminine as separated and
distinct, which the play itself undercuts.
Although Antony occasionally lapses into judging himself by the
standards of the patriarchy - for example, towards the end of the play dejected
and shamed by his diminished political power, he becomes jealous and irrational
and claims that Cleopatra has emasculated him: 'O thy vile lady, / She has
robbed me of my sword.' In the conflict between love and politics - love wins.
Ultimately, Antony is not debased by his loss of power, but rather, through his
love of Cleopatra envelops a manhood of stronger parameters - an 'alternative
masculinity' as Woodbridge puts it. The end of the play can be seen as a
tribute to love; a celebration rather than a downfall. Antony does not cease to
be a valiant Roman by choosing Egypt over Rome; love over politics, but becomes
vanquisher of himself in his suicide. By dying simultaneously in the Roman
fashion, and with Cleopatra and for Cleopatra (he kills himself when he
believes she is dead), Antony combines the two polarities which have been
evident and separate throughout the play: the masculine Rome and the feminine
Egypt.
Cleopatra's masculine qualities counterbalance the play, so
Shakespeare provides us with a relationship of surprising equality. Neither
Cleopatra nor the relationship can be stifled within the confines of the
patriarchy of the seventeenth century. The distinctions between masculine and
feminine are blurred - in a sense Antony and Cleopatra swap roles, continually
embracing both their masculine and feminine selves and thus experiencing a full
bonding of souls. As Woodbridge says, 'Antony and Cleopatra can cross gender
boundaries without losing their sex roles as man or woman'. This swapping of
gender roles is rather shockingly portrayed in the scene in which Cleopatra
puts her 'tires and mantles on [Antony] whilst / [she] wore his sword
Phillipan'. Shakespeare evidently recognises the existence of both masculine
and feminine qualities within females and males.
Cleopatra, unlike Othello and Ophelia, is the dominating force of
the play in terms of theme and also her personal presence. Novy claims that
Antony and Cleopatra is the only tragedy that 'glorifies woman as actor'.
Through his treatment of Cleopatra, Shakespeare provides us with a 'real' woman
rather than a stereotype. Velma Richmond claims further that in Cleopatra we
can find Shakespeare's 'finest embracing of the feminine'. Cleopatra through
the combination of sexual and political power is a force to be reckoned with.
Cleopatra's sexuality, despite condemnation by the patriarchal men
- she is referred to as 'strumpet' and 'whore' on various occasions throughout
the play - is unhidden and unrestricted. Her sexual power over men is conveyed
boldly, for example, in her descriptions of her former conquests 'great Pompey'
and 'Broad-fronted Caesar'. Cleopatra's sexuality is not a thing to be locked
up, as in Hamlet and Othello, but is celebrated as
a positive force. Surprisingly, even Enobarbus, despite his patriarchal views,
does on occasions present her as positively sexual, as his unforgettable
description of her indicates:
Age cannot wither her,
Nor custom stale her infinite variety. Other women cloy
The appetites they feed, but she makes hungry
Where most she satisfies. For vilest things
Become themselves in her, that the holy priests
Bless she is riggish.
Nor custom stale her infinite variety. Other women cloy
The appetites they feed, but she makes hungry
Where most she satisfies. For vilest things
Become themselves in her, that the holy priests
Bless she is riggish.
Refusing to adhere to the stereotypes of patriarchal society,
Cleopatra transforms her natural sexuality into part of her power, rather than
as a diminishing of her goodness.
So too, Cleopatra insists on fulfilling a political role against
the wishes of the patriarchal men: when Enobarbus attempts to prevent her from
doing so she replies in enraged determination:
A charge we bear i'th'war,
And as the president of my kingdom will
Appear there for a man. Speak not against it.
I will not stay behind.
And as the president of my kingdom will
Appear there for a man. Speak not against it.
I will not stay behind.
Cleopatra thus forces her access into the male arena, where
Ophelia and Desdemona do not - and cannot of course, in the same way, for in
her status as a middle aged woman and Queen of Egypt, Cleopatra naturally has
more freedom. She is not dependent upon anyone financially, as are Ophelia and
Desdemona.
Ophelia, the dominated daughter, is completely dependent. Although
a flash of her potential self-will shines through at the beginning of the play,
when we learn that Ophelia has entertained Hamlet unchaperoned or without
paternal consent, this is stifled very quickly by Polonius and Laertes - the
double voice of the patriarchy - telling her that she is naive and that her
behaviour is unsuitable. Ophelia, daunted by their claims that she has mistaken
Hamlet's love, assumes that her father and brother necessarily know best and
replies simply 'I will obey'. Shakespeare shows, however, that it is this
obedience of Ophelia's that leads to her own destruction, and illustrates that
when the guiding male is like the cynical Polonius or the unperceptive Laertes,
the fate of the subordinate female is considerably threatened.
While Ophelia then, silently and obediently accepts the oppression
of male power, turning her distress in upon herself in her madness, Desdemona
does display some traces of a more Cleopatra-like self-assertion. In her
choosing of Othello as her husband, she exercises her own desire, subverting
the female role of passivity within the patriarch, and marries him without
parental consent. This is a rather courageous act of will, which could have
resulted in much strife. However, she handles the situation with a cleverness
and a manipulation which outwits the male judges who listen to her. When her
father questions her about her marriage she answers forcefully, first pacifying
him and then justifying her disobedience on the very grounds of patriarchal
obedience and duty:
. . . My noble father,
I do perceive here a divided duty.
To you I am bound, for life and education . . .
You are the lord of my duty,
I am hitherto your daughter. But here's my husband,
And so much duty as my mother showed
To you preferring you before her father,
So much I challenge that I may profess
Due to the Moor my lord.
I do perceive here a divided duty.
To you I am bound, for life and education . . .
You are the lord of my duty,
I am hitherto your daughter. But here's my husband,
And so much duty as my mother showed
To you preferring you before her father,
So much I challenge that I may profess
Due to the Moor my lord.
Desdemona by her cleverness thus appears obedient in her
disobedience.
Shakespeare shows Desdemona's behaviour in her relationship with
Othello before the marriage to be slightly manipulative also. For Desdemona
tells Othello in a very suggestive way after she has fallen in love with him,
as Othello himself relates - 'if I had a friend that loved [me]/ I should but
teach him how to tell [your] story,/ And that would woo [me]'. However, when
she is married she slips into the role of the submissive wife. Obedient to
Othello's every command, she says to Emilia - after Othello tells her
peremptorily 'Get you to bed on th'instant' - 'we must not now displease him'.
At this point Desdemona becomes more of a stereotype, her identity disappearing
as Othello's jealousy becomes more defined. Her identity diminishes until she
fits into the stereotype of the silent woman. Othello denies her right to a
voice when he soliloquises 'Was this fair paper, this most goodly book,/ Made
to write 'whore' upon?'
Obedience and silence were very much part of the patriarchal
conception of femininity. A conception to which Cleopatra refuses to adhere.
When Charmian traditionally suggests that the way to gain and retain Antony's
love is to 'In each thing give him way; Cross him in nothing'. Cleopatra
replies, 'Thou teachest like a fool, the way to lose him'. Far from being the
silent woman, Cleopatra makes her voice heard whenever she wishes, challenging
and meeting challenges. She mocks Antony and quarrels with him. Challenging him
with a masculine aggression when they argue - 'I would I had thine inches. Thou
shouldst know/ There were a heart in Egypt'. Spirited and passionate, such
displays of assertion as her physical attack on the messenger informing her of
Antony's marriage to Octavia, are a far cry from the passive silent role of the
feminine in patriarchal society. In passionate disbelief and anger, she draws a
knife on the messenger and strikes him with her bare hands. Charmian tries to
pacify her by telling her 'Good madam keep yourself within yourself', but
Cleopatra escapes the bounds of self-composure and the repression of self-hood.
Her reaction when she feels herself wronged is in very stark contrast to the
reactions of Ophelia and Desdemona.
Linda Baber explains that the relative weakness of the characters
of Desdemona and Ophelia is due to artistic device, as opposed to Shakespeare's
misrepresentation of womanhood. Baber claims that they are 'psychologically
neutral characters who take on the coloration of the plays' moods'. Thus, their
personalities are not fully developed. James Hill similarly says of the
heroines of the tragedies that we are not shown 'their inner lives' or their
'inner conflicts'. However, in the case of Desdemona, I think it is a mistake
not to recognise her as an active force within the play. As Brian Shaffer
suggests Othello's punishment of Desdemona becomes the crime itself, subverting
the domestic tragedy of the Elizabethan stage. These tragedies traditionally
involve the process of marriage; 'disintegration' and then punishment and
death. The conception of woman's inferiority to man in these tragedies is
undercut by Shakespeare for he shows Desdemona to be the virtuous character who
is finally vindicated.
Desdemona's goodness furthermore is not simply passive or weak but
an act of will. Her refusal to blame Othello for his terrible treatment of her,
when he suspects her of betrayal, must not be viewed as simple subservience but
as a self-willed refusal to accept a bad opinion of the husband she has chosen.
When he is behaving deplorably towards her she refuses to acknowledge his
identity - 'My lord is not my lord,' she says 'nor should I know him / Were he
in favour as in humour altered'. She stands by her acceptance of her love for
him as something sacred, with a martyr-like determination: she tells Emilia
'his unkindness may defeat my life, / But never taint my love.' She thus obeys
her own heart rather than patriarchal rules, extending this determination
through to death, so that with her last breath - when Emilia asks 'who hath
done this deed?' she can reply 'Nobody, I myself'. Othello's conviction that
even upon dying she lies by claiming this self-death bears witness to the whole
tragedy of the play, Othello's inability to see beneath the surface of
stereotypical conceptions of femininity. By claiming this death for herself she
re-affirms her self-hood. Metaphorically then she dies for her love which
cannot be tainted, not from Othello's hands. In Hamlet too, Ophelia's death can
perhaps be seen as an act of assertion and escape from the confining
patriarchal world.
Unsurprisingly though, it is through the character of Cleopatra
that Shakespeare really depicts death as an assertion of self-hood and an act
of defiance to the patriarchal laws. Cleopatra's death becomes an act of
triumph over Caesar - the representative of patriarchal Rome. On finding her
dead, one of his guards says, 'Caesar's beguiled'. Through death Cleopatra not
only transcends the world of oppression and fate, but embraces her death as a
positive act rather than as an act of negation:
My desolation does begin to make a better life
. . . And it is great
To do that thing that ends all other deeds,
Which shackles accidents and bolts up change
. . . And it is great
To do that thing that ends all other deeds,
Which shackles accidents and bolts up change
Cleopatra combines feminine and masculine qualities through her
death. With her resolution to take on the masculine quality of rationality and
firmness and courage she wills, 'I have nothing of woman in me. Now from head
to foot/ I am marble constant'. She rejects her feminine qualities of water and
the changeability of the moon and transforms herself into 'air and fire'. So
too she embraces Antony's masculinity and the world of Rome by dying in 'the
true Roman Fashion'. Yet through her death, Shakespeare depicts her as enacting
the strength of womanhood by converting death into an image of both sensuality
and motherhood. The pain of death is bitter-sweet and sensual 'as a lover's
pinch,/which hurts and is desired' and the asp, the vehicle of death is a 'baby
at [her] breast,/That sucks the nurse asleep'. Through death she is reborn and
even the stern patriarchal Caesar is forced to admit to her bravery, and to the
undeniable nobility and royalty of the woman who 'Took her own way'. Through
his representation of womanhood, especially in the character of Cleopatra,
Shakespeare indeed does transcend the stereotypes of his own time.
Bibliography
Baker, W. Brodie's notes ed. Graham Handily
Colin, Philip C. Shakespeare and Feminist Criticism 1991
Baker, W. Brodie's notes ed. Graham Handily
Colin, Philip C. Shakespeare and Feminist Criticism 1991
No comments:
Post a Comment